“Moral good is a practical stimulus: it is no sooner seen, than it inspires an impulse to practice…” Plutarch
Experience shows the tremendous power of simply seeing moral good enacted. This, in part, is why they say you never know all the effects of your good action. Who knows who has seen it and will never be the same again?
We underestimate the importance of our being exposed to moral excellence—especially in a world that relentlessly parades moral failure. At issue here is not ‘hiding’ from moral failure, or building some kind of fantasy world of moral purity. The reality is this: by nature the main way we come to understand a good human life, and are moved to form an intention of living one ourselves, is in seeing it done. In reality and in art.
Happiness is powerfully undermined today by the fact that moral turpitude is taken, explicitly or implicitly, to be the norm.
Two significant signs and causes of this are in what we consider ‘news-worthy’ and in how we entertain ourselves. Let us focus on the second; and let us set aside the distinction between entertainment and leisure (though it is certainly worth making—see below). Watching movies is a significant part of our entertainment. What kind of discernment do we exercise in judging movies and deciding what to watch?
How art relates to ‘reality,’ and how to judge art is of course a complex subject, one not to be over-simplified. But in view of Plutarch’s critical insight into human nature, we can make one important conclusion. Art can and should be judged with the standard of how it helps us see, or not, a truly good human life.
A distinction here is fitting: how people actually live versus how they should live. One might ask: If art in some way imitates reality then shouldn’t it reflect the way people actually live? Again, this is a complex question to which the answer must be ‘yes’ to some extent. But the distinction here needs to be made with nuance.
One can think about and describe how people ‘actually’ live, while abstracting from any moral lens. But in reality, this is analagous to describing an apple tree in abstraction from how and whether it can produce apples. In other words, not to see and include the moral dimension in human life is always to omit an essential aspect of what is really there.
I am convinced that one of the most deleterious aspects of contemporary entertainment is how it regularly makes human life seem to be ‘real,’ to be what it is, apart from moral standards—or in any case traditional moral standards. Here, for example, is a young professional whose sexual practices are utterly disconnected from the drama of his life as portrayed in a film. The problem with such entertainment goes far beyond simple ‘bad example.’ It warps our perception of the reality of being human.
Virtuous characters are perhaps seldom portrayed because of a general lack of imagination and vision of them. Lack of experience of such people in real life leads to a lack of portrayal in art, and vice versa. A vicious circle, literally. This is not to suggest that only virtuous characters should be portrayed. Moral drama can be messy; but genuine moral drama is always in the context of the truth of human life.
What to do? We can begin by attending to what is in our power—our own choices. Plutarch’s insight is implication rich, and it gives us direction. We can put a priority on forming our own vision in two main ways: our immediate contact with reality, and our mediated contact through art.
The importance of the latter must not be underestimated. We can improve our diet, exercising vigilance and discernment at the gate of our soul. There are so many truly great stories—oral, written, and audio-visual. And these can “inspire an impulse,” in us and others, to enact the kind of life that is human life indeed.
~ ~ ~
Image: Gary Cooper in the classic High Noon. I have a series of several short videos (6-8 minutes each) in Concepts Made Clear, distinguishing leisure, amusement (entertainment), and work. Your feedback is always welcome. Become a LifeCraft member to access all videos. Here is the one on amusement:
Join the Community.
Become a LifeCraft Member and gain access to our online courses and exclusive content. It's FREE of charge. Period.
If you join as a contributing member, you will help make this content available to an increasing audience and enable me to spend more time in this work. I thank you in advance.
Join the LifeCraft community today and get access to:
- Man of the Household (Course)
- Woman of the Household (Course)
- Concepts Made Clear (Mini-course)
- Dinner at Home (Mini-course)
Facing Discouragement: A Greek Insight
Discouragement, or at least its temptation, regularly accompanies intentional living. Even if we do not formulate it explicitly we find ourselves feeling “why do the good things I want have to be so difficult?” It is a consolation to know this is not unique to our...
Toxic Fatherhood?
There are important analogies between a father in a family and a ruler in a nation. This is perhaps especially clear in the consequences of their failure. Aquinas writes that “royal dignity is rendered hateful to many people on account of the wickedness of tyrants.”...
Master of His Time
“He had no ‘time of his own’ (except in his bed-cell), and yet he was becoming master of his time; he began to know just what he could do with it.” J.R.R. Tolkien, Leaf by Niggle Many of the greatest traps of our day appear in the guise of simple math. One of them...
Husband, father, and professor of Philosophy. LifeCraft springs from one conviction: there is an ancient wisdom about how to live the good life in our homes, with our families; and it is worth our time to hearken to it. Let’s rediscover it together. Learn more.
It’s so true that the entertainment we “consume” has profound and lasting effects on personal and social morality. Thanks, Dr. Cuddeback, for exploring this overlooked and/or underestimated subject. In my own way and to a much smaller audience, I’ve also tried to bring home this crucial point.
https://newtonfinn.com/2011/12/15/would-paladin-have-shot-bin-laden/
Thank you, Newton. Your piece here is well-argued and very thought-provoking.
What might we make of the reductive impulses of an age in which, for amusement’s sake, the invocation of Calliope renders us with intimations of Disney’s Marvel film franchise?
In practice, as Plutarch notes, we might observe two instances of hermeneutic with such cinematic mimesis of the virtues of heroism. Is the pursuit of the good life to be more like the art or art to be more like the pursuit of the good life? Do we permit one to inform the other? In deed, I observe that one will find the practice of the art to build up the practical life and the practical life to hone the practice of the art. In the sense of a will done on earth as in heaven, nowhere is there more important medium for searching out what heaven might be like than in the mimesis of a fine art.
But, still, what might one make of all this in an age of deconstruction? Where all standards of beauty are not to be admired but to be pitied? And should one exemplify the virtue of building up his brothers and elevate a true standard, of facing exile or worse?
I think, here, not of Spidermen, but of Saint Sampson of old and his victory over the Philistines. Not a Pyrrhic Victory, but a type for the victory of the Cross and Holy Sampson’s crossing that bridge in the Harrowing of Hell.
For my part, Daniel, I say that even in an age of deconstruction, we plod onward doing what we can: in any case in our own little corner of the garden, and in more public ways when it is given to us to do so.
“What more could I have done for [my vineyard]? What say you of the wild grapes it bore, instead of the grapes I looked for?” Isaiah 5:4 (Knox)